SQL
SQL Databases have powerful features, many of which are available via the DreamFactory REST API.
- Schema Discovery and Manipulation
- Related Data
- Views
- Use of Expressions
- Stored Procedure and Functions
Contents
Drivers and Connection Strings
- SQLite
- MySQL, MariaDB, or Percona
- PostgreSQL
- Microsoft SQL Server
- SAP SQL Anywhere
- Oracle Database
- IBM DB2
Related Data
One of the most powerful features of SQL databases is the ability to relate separate data records and perform queries that retrieve that related data all at once. DreamFactory's SQL DB service discovers these relationships automatically from the schema in your database. This allows clients of the API to work with related data as one unit. You don't have to provision anything except the connection parameters. The service can only access schema and records that are allowed by the credentials given in the connection parameters. Additional restrictions for the access through the API may be provisioned using our user role setup.
Building New Relationships
Using the schema portion of the database service, relationships between new or existing tables can easily be created. Consider the following schema for a demo of tracking contacts in a database. Here we can show the various ways data can be related and how to use our API to discover these relationships and perform CRUD operations with them. Note: The tables here have been edited for size and clarity, to see the full schema, see [contact_demo_schema.json]. The schema here can be posted to the database schema API, or imported into the Schema Manager in the admin application, to create these tables and relationships.
{ "description": "These tables comprise the contacts demo suite schema, used by the demo app and test suites.", "table": [ { "description": "The main table for tracking contacts.", "name": "contact", "field": [ { "name": "id", "label": "Contact Id", "type": "id" }, { "name": "first_name", "type": "string", "length": 40, "allow_null": false, "is_index": true, "validation": { "not_empty": { "on_fail": "First name value must not be empty." } } }, { "name": "last_name", "type": "string", "allow_null": false, "is_index": true, "length": 40 }, { "description": "Relates one contact to another, an inter-table many-to-one relationship.", "name": "reports_to", "type": "reference", "ref_table": "contact", "ref_fields": "id" }, ... ] }, { "description": "The contact details sub-table, owned by contact table row.", "name": "contact_info", "field": [ { "name": "id", "label": "Info Id", "type": "id" }, { "description": "Relates contact_info to contact row, an many-to-one relationship.", "name": "contact_id", "type": "reference", "allow_null": false, "ref_table": "contact", "ref_fields": "id", "ref_on_delete": "CASCADE" }, ... ] }, { "description": "The main table for tracking groups of contact.", "name": "contact_group", "field": [ { "name": "id", "type": "id" }, { "name": "name", "type": "string", "length" 128, "allow_null": false, "validation": { "not_empty": { "on_fail": "Group name value must not be empty." } } }, ... ] }, { "description": "The join table for tracking contacts in groups, creates a many-to-many relationship.", "name": "contact_group_relationship", "field": [ { "name": "id", "type": "id" }, { "name": "contact_id", "type": "reference", "allow_null": false, "ref_table": "contact", "ref_fields": "id", "ref_on_delete": "CASCADE" }, { "name": "contact_group_id", "type": "reference", "allow_null": false, "ref_table": "contact_group", "ref_fields": "id", "ref_on_delete": "CASCADE" } ] }, { "description": "The join table for tracking associated contacts, creating a many-to-many relationship.", "name": "associated_contact", "field": [ { "name": "id", "type": "id" }, { "name": "contact_id", "type": "reference", "allow_null": false, "ref_table": "contact", "ref_fields": "id", "ref_on_delete": "CASCADE" }, { "name": "associated_id", "type": "reference", "allow_null": false, "ref_table": "contact", "ref_fields": "id" }, ... ] } ] }
Discovering the Relationships
Likewise, schema can be retrieved by the database schema API to discover existing relationships.
So the following GET request to/api/v2/<db_service_name>/_schema/contactpulls the contact table's schema as well as its relationships (Note: Edited for size and clarity).
{ "name": "contact", "label": "Contact", "plural": "Contacts", "primary_key": "id", "name_field": null, "field": [ ... ], "related": [ { "name": "associated_contacts_by_associated_id", "type": "has_many", "ref_table": "associated_contact", "ref_field": "associated_id", "field": "id" }, { "name": "associated_contacts_by_contact_id", "type": "has_many", "ref_table": "associated_contact", "ref_field": "contact_id", "field": "id" }, { "name": "contact_by_reports_to", "type": "belongs_to", "ref_table": "contact", "ref_field": "id", "field": "reports_to" }, { "name": "contact_group_relationships_by_contact_id", "type": "has_many", "ref_table": "contact_group_relationship", "ref_field": "contact_id", "field": "id" }, { "name": "contact_groups_by_contact_group_relationship", "type": "many_many", "ref_table": "contact_group", "ref_field": "id", "join": "contact_group_relationship(contact_id,contact_group_id)", "field": "id" }, { "name": "contact_infos_by_contact_id", "type": "has_many", "ref_table": "contact_info", "ref_field": "contact_id", "field": "id" } ] }
Note that auto-generated "related" section returned with the schema gives the following details about each relationship.
- name - The auto-generated relationship name to be used when issuing CRUD requests on records.
- type - One of "belongs_to", "has_many", or "many_many", describing the type of the relationship each reference has to the table queried.
- ref_table - The related table making up the other side of the relationship with the table queried.
- ref_field - The field in ref_table that makes up the {table,field} tuple of the reference, i.e. the foreign key.
- field - The field on the table queried that is part of the relationship, i.e. what is pointed to by the reference.
- join - A generalized statement about the junction table, that joins the ref_table to the queried table, including the two fields that point to each side of the relationship.
The server actually uses this information to dictate the behavior of how things are retrieved and updated when dealing with related data. While most of this information may seem unnecessary for the client side to know, the name is necessary when using related data in API transactions. The type field also comes in handy, as you will see in the following section.
This particular schema states that...
- contact_info records must belong to a single contact record, via the contact_id field. A contact record may have zero or more contact_info records pointing to it, i.e. one for work, another for home, etc. That is, contact_info has a "many-to-one" relationship to contact.
- contact records may belong to zero or more contact_group records, via the contact_group_relationship junction table. You could also say that each contact_group "contains" zero to multiple contact records, a "many-to-many" relationship.
- A contact record may be "belong" directly to one other contact record, via the reports_to field, creating a "belongs-to" relationship.
- A contact may be associated indirectly with zero or more contact records, via associated_contact junction table, creating a "many-to-many" relationship.
Getting the Related Data
When using data in your application, you might want to retrieve, interact, and display related data as complete units, not individual pieces. The DreamFactory REST API can return related records as part of the primary record queried so that all of the related data is in one JSON record. For SQL DB Services, when performing CRUD operations (see database records API for general usage), there are a few additional URL parameters that aid in retrieving the desired related table records. Like the fields parameter, these can be used on all CRUD operations.
- related - Comma-delimited list of relations to return for each record in response, or "*" to retrieve all related records. By default, all fields of the related record(s) are returned. Optional fields, limit, and order can be sent for each relation. The following separate URL parameters apply to each relationship given...
- <relation_name>.fields - A comma-delimited list of fields to return in the response for the related record(s). If this parameter is set to "*" or missing, all fields will be returned. Setting it to empty ("") will result in just the primary key field(s) and value(s) being returned.
- <relation_name>.limit - An integer count value limiting the number of related records of the given relationship to return in the response. Default is unlimited until max response size met.
- <relation_name>.order - Declares the ‘order by’ field and direction for sorting the related results per record per relationship.
An API retrieve, by id or by filter string, using the related URL parameter pulls the existing relationships, and adds them to the requested record(s) using the relationship name as the additional field name. For the relationship types of has_many and many_many, the value of that field will always be an array of records (which could be empty "[]"). For the relationship type of belongs_to, the value of that field will either be "null", or a single record.
For example, retrieving the record and related data for a specific contact with primary key '1'...
GET /api/v2/db/_table/contact/1?related=contact_infos_by_contact_id,contact_groups_by_contact_group_relationship
{ "record": [ { "id": 1, "first_name": "Jon", "last_name": "Yang", "display_name": "Jon Yang", ... "reports_to": null, "contact_infos_by_contact_id": [ { "id": 1, "contact_id": 1, "info_type": "home", "phone": "500 555-0162", "email": "[email protected]", "address": "3761 N. 14th St", "city": "MEDINA", "state": "ND", "zip": "58467", "country": "USA" }, { "id": 2, "contact_id": 1, "info_type": "work", "phone": "500 555-0110", "email": "[email protected]", "address": "2243 W St.", "city": "MEDINA", "state": "ND", "zip": "58467", "country": "USA" } ], "contact_group_relationships_by_contact_id": [ { "id": 1, "contact_id": 1, "contact_group_id": 7 } ], "contact_groups_by_contact_group_relationship": [ { "id": 7, "name": "Mid West" } ] } ] }
Creating the Related Data
When you create new records using our REST API via the POST command, you can add new relationships to the records in two ways...
- create new related records and automatically create the relationship between them, or
- create a relationship to other already existing records (updating those related records at the same time)
For example, the following command accomplishes all of the following in one POST request...
- creating a new contact Joe Smith,
- creating some work information for the new contact,
- creating a new group "ACME Inc." for Joe's company
- adding Joe to our existing "Sales" contact group
POST /api/v2/db/_table/contact
{ "first_name": "Joe", "last_name": "Smith", "display_name": "Joe Smith", "contact_infos_by_contact_id": [ { "info_type": "Work", "phone": "555-555-1234", "email": "[email protected]", "address": "1234 Demo Way", "city": "ATLANTA", "state": "GA", "zip": "30303", "country": "USA" } ], "contact_groups_by_contact_group_relationship": [ { "name": "ACME Inc." }, { "id": 1, "name": "Sales" } ] }
Notice that no primary key is included in the related contact_info or the new contact_group records. This indicates that they are new records that need to be created. After the records are created, the relationships are automatically created. For the contact_info, the contact_id field is simply set to the newly created contact records primary key. For the contact_group, an entry is added to the contact_group_relationship junction table linking the two new records.
To relate the new contact record with existing records, just include the identifying (i.e. primary key) fields or the whole existing record. Joe is added to the "Sales" group by automatically adding an entry in the contact_group_relationship junction table. The "name" is not necessary in this case, only the primary key of the group record. In fact, if the "name" or other fields are included along with the identifying fields, they are considered for update on that record (see updates section below). Note that for direct relationships, if the relating field (for contact_info it is contact_id) is in the record, the value will be overwritten with the current contact record's primary key, essentially "adopting" the contact_info record from one contact record to another.
Updating the Related Data
When you update existing records using the REST API PATCH command, you can change relationships to the records in three ways...
- create new related records and automatically create the relationship between them, or
- create a relationship to other already existing records (updating them at the same time), or
- remove a relationship to existing related records
For example, we want to update Joe's contact record (given the id "33" from earlier creation) with a twitter handle, add his home phone and address info, update his address in the work info, and add him to your "Golf" group. We do this by issuing a PATCH request with the necessary related information.
PATCH /api/v2/db/_table/contact/33
{ "twitter": "@popular_joe", "contact_infos_by_contactId": [ { "info_type": "Home", "phone": "555-555-5678", "email": "[email protected]", "address": "999 Back Nine Drive", "city": "ATLANTA", "state": "GA", "zip": "30301", "country": "USA" }, { "id": 44, "address": "1111 Demo Way" } ], "contact_groups_by_contact_group_relationship": [ { "id": 9 } ] }
The contact_info with id "44" is Joe's work info created earlier, and the contact_group with id "9" is a pre-existing group named "Golf". As with any of the above scenarios, when updating related records, you can pass only what changed or the whole record, whatever is most convenient for your application. You can also pass Joe's whole record including the primary key to the contact resource. This also works for updating multiple contact records at once.
Unrelating or Removing Related Data
To remove relationships from a record, we include the relating fields to indicate to the service to remove the relationship. With directly related records, just set the relating field to null. In our example, this is contact_id for contact_info records. We include the following URL parameter to help with cleanup of disassociated or abandoned records.
- allow_related_delete - Defaults to false. When the relating field's database schema is set so that it will not allow null values (allow_null is false), i.e. requires a parent value, this record can not stand alone unrelated and thus must be deleted. As a safety catch, this scenario will return an error unless this URL parameter is set to true, at which time the service will attempt to delete the related child record.
For records related via a junction table, add the serviced table's primary key field and set it to null (i.e. the table being serviced here is contact, note the "table-dot-field" notation separating it from the rest of the fields in the record). In our example, this is "contact.contact_id" in the contact_group records. The relationship is automatically removed by deleting the linking entry from junction table, in this case contact_group_relationship. For records related via junction tables, like contact_group, this scenario can be managed by schema setup (on_update/on_delete properties with settings of SET_NULL or CASCADE).
So now we want to remove Joe from the "Sales" and "ACME" groups, and remove his work contact info. The request would look like the following...
PATCH /api/v2/db/_table/contact/33
{ "contact_infos_by_contactId": [ { "id": 44, "contact_id": null } ], "contact_groups_by_contact_group_relationship": [ { "id": 3, "contact.contact_id": null "name": "ACME" }, { "id": 1, "contact.contact_id": null "name": "Sales" } ] }
As before, the "name" fields are not required, and are just there for clarification.
Reminders
Native record fields are updated as usual.
If related records are contained in the request, the fields contained in the request trigger different actions.
If the related table's primary key field is not included in the related record, it is assumed that this record doesn't exist yet (or if the primary key isn't an auto-incrementing field) and, if allowed, the related record is created along with the new relationship.
For Parent-Child Relationships: Existing related records are updated, if allowed. If parent lookup field is in the record and not set to null, the value will be overwritten with the current parent record's primary key (useful when "adopting" other records). If parent lookup field is in the record and it is set to null, indicating that this child needs to be removed from the relationship, the lookup field is set to null, or if allowed (see above) is deleted.
For Many-to-Many Relationships: If the primary key of the related table (using dot notation) is set and has a null value, the junction table record is deleted thus removing the relationship.
All of this logic works for creating or updating single records or multiple records at a time. The "related" parameter can also be used (along with "fields" parameter) when making requests (POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE) and retrieving changed data in one shot (see the API/SDK in the admin panel).
Views
Views are currently treated just like tables and behave similarly except that the schema can not be updated, i.e. fields can not be added, changed or removed through the schema API resource.
Using Expressions as Field Values
When creating or updating records in database tables, the fields are typically set directly with static values, like strings, numbers, etc. However most databases also support assigning values to fields by using certain expressions. The SQL DB Service API supports using expressions when setting field values. The expressions available for use are dictated by the support of the underlying database vendor and its configuration (check your database vendor documentation for specifics), but may include things such as formatting, conversions, math, and string manipulations.
There are a couple of ways to declare usage of expressions in field values. Both require the use of an expression element, one simply assigning the string expression to the value of that element; the other allows for a value and an additional params element.
Simple Assignment
Use a JSON object with a single element of expression with the value set to the qualified database expression in double quotes.
{ "resource": [ { "<field_name>": { "expression" : "<expression>" } } ] }
Examples
To set the last_updated field to the current database server timestamp...
PATCH http[s]://<server>/api/v2t/<service>/_table/<table_name>/1
{ "last_updated": { "expression" : "NOW()" } }
To set the times_updated field to one more than the current value...
PATCH http[s]://<server>/api/v2/<service>/_table/<table_name>/1
{ "times_updated": { "expression" : "times_updated + 1" } }
Assignment Requiring Additional Params
Like above, except the value of the expression expression is set to a JSON object containing a value element set to the actual expression, and a params element set to an object of name-value pairs containing parameters required by the expression.
{ "resource": [ { "<field_name>": { "expression" : { "value" : "<expression>", "params" : { "<param_name>" : "<param_value>" } } } } ] }
Examples
To set name_lower to the lower case value of the "name" parameter passed in...
POST http[s]://<server>/api/v2t/<service>/_table/<table_name>
{ "resource": [ { "name": "Barbara", "name_lower": { "expression" : { "value" : "LOWER(:name)", "params" : { ":name" : "Barbara" } } } } ] }